Walk a mile in another's shoes. Move on in your own.
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Palin's Got That Lean and Hungry Look: Can She Rewrite History?
Is it true that Sarah Palin was minding her business like Little Miss Muffet with absolutely no interest in becoming the Republican vice presidential nominee at all until John McCain called her up? I ask this question because last night on Larry King Live, Judge Judy, who did not vote McCain/Palin, said that she didn't like how the Republicans were infighting, back-biting, and blaming Sarah Palin for McCain's loss. The back-biting is not deserved, Judge Judy believes, unless, of course, Palin had gone after the Vice President nomination.
So, for some people the conclusion is Sarah Palin is blameless because she never asked to be the nominee. They might change their minds, however, if they discover she lobbied for the VP slot and attempted to woo Washington before she got the McCain call. There's evidence that she did just that.
Nevertheless, I still say that Republicans should not blame Palin for losing the election and exaggerate her shortcomings now because it suits them. The buck stops with the leader, McCain, for inviting and selecting her to join him on the ticket. And, as I've said before, Republicans need to take responsibility for voting her in at the RNC without first fully vetting her.
Think conservatives didn't see Palin coming? Think again. Here's YouTube video of conservative Bill Kristol columnist back in June, two months before the Palin selection, on Fox News, praising the Alaska governor, making a "prediction" that McCain would choose her, and accusing liberals of being misogynistic when it came to Hillary Clinton. Some in the liberal camp (and the conservative as well) indeed sprayed sexist spittle over Hillary, but Kristol goes further to say Republicans would never be misogynistic because they respect strong women. Hmm, how does he explain Republicans tossing Palin on the figurative funeral pyre?
But wait! There's more. Here is a link to Kristol in October 2008 saying that Palin's pick was a surprise to him and he thought McCain should have chosen Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) as his running mate. Is Kristol delusional? Did he forget what he said about Palin in June? Well, no, he sort of remembers, and he also shows where his head is in that he thought McCain should pick Palin mostly because President-elect Barack Obama did not pick Hillary Clinton. Isn't that what liberals said about the Palin choice, that McCain didn't choose Palin because she was the best candidate but because she was female? Oh, I get it. If you point that out and you're liberal, then you're sexist. If you're a conservative and say it, then you're savvy.
Or, I said a woman, just because I think Obama's failure to pick Hillary Clinton provided an opening. And of the women that I mentioned in the New York Times column that I wrote in the week before McCain's pick, I mentioned Palin, and Meg Whitman, the former CEO of eBay, as the two likely picks. I think I'm one of the few people in Washington who actually spent some time with Governor Palin a year ago, when we had our Weekly Standard cruise in Alaska, and I was impressed by her. I thought she would've been a bold and interesting pick and I think she was a bold and interesting pick. She's obviously been pummeled by the media, and has made some mistakes, and I think it has been mishandled by some of the McCain team. And like I said, since we speak 12 hours before the debate, it's a little hard to come to a conclusion on whether this was a smart, bold pick, or a foolish, bold pick. (Bill Kristol)
I also add this radio clip that I found at a pro-McCain/Palin blog, Draft Sarah Palin for Vice President, of Sarah Palin being interviewed on Fox radio in June 2008 about the energy crisis and drilling for oil.
No comments:
Post a Comment