Showing posts with label Ferguson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ferguson. Show all posts

Saturday, December 6, 2014

Blacksplain vs. Mansplain vs. Whitesplain vs. Poem

I wrote the poem "Song of the Fatigued Blacksplaining Folk" during National Poetry Month of this year, and recently turned it into a digital poster that's embedded farther down in this blog post. As the title indicates, and to borrow the words of Fannie Lou Hamer, "I am tired of being sick and tired" of explaining racism in America and how racist policies hurt not only people of color but the entire country.

Of course, living under Jim Crow laws, Ms. Hamer had a much tougher life than I did. Still, I get frustrated sometimes because some of the words that come out of the mouths of some white people sound like they'd be fine with returning to Jim Crow. Yes, there are many "white allies," who want America to live up to its credo, but there area also many who refuse to even attempt to understand systemic racism and how it contributes to many of the problems found in black communities, especially poor black communities.

Also, the last two years have been more difficult than usual because of the increase in the number of unarmed black people killed by either police officers or by white citizens. Both the officers and the vigilantes tend to claim they felt threatened even when the black person, often a young black male, is unarmed. Essentially they assert black people's bodies are weapons.

I had the pleasure of reading my poem at the Poetry Buffet at Latter Library on St. Charles Avenue earlier this fall. The multi-ethnic audience appeared to enjoy it.



© 2014 Nordette N. Adams

Click picture to enlarge.

You may have heard the invented words mansplain, which is a combination of man and explain, and whitesplain, as in white people explaining. The word blacksplain is a combination of black, meaning black people, and explain. However, unlike mansplain, which is the word given to a condescending explanation a male gives to a female, the word blacksplain is usually not associated with condescension, unless, of course, a white person is defining it who's shown him or herself to be a racist jackass. If that's you, then a black person may have blacksplained something to you in a condescending manner before.

Usually to blacksplain is to explain some aspect of black culture, history, heritage, or experience to a person who is not black. That person may be a sincere person who is asking a potentially offensive question but does not mean to offend. Or that person may be a racist jackass who still doesn't understand that America works this way: A black person has to be able to shift between white culture and black culture/white world and black world easily in order to be successful. But often white people don't have to know anything significant and factual about black people in order to be successful.

Frequently black people end up blacksplaining on some racism-related topic. For example, at UrbanDictionary.com, the first definition of blacksplain is actually an example of racist hate speech that's allowed to remain there probably because their editors are hipsters (see hipster racism) who think it's okay to have the offensive defintion since a more accurate definition follows it. In reality, the definition of blacksplain on that website is very similar to how n*gg*r used to be defined in the Webster's dictionary as "a Negro person." Only the worst stereotypes are included in the definition, but they let it ride because I guess they consider themselves "urban."

The word urban is often used as a euphemism for people of color, primarily black people, Latinos, and Mexicans, but as is the often the case, on one hand its used to marginalize people of color and on the other a white person uses it to make money. An even better example of that phenomena would be the success of Thug Kitchen. At CNN, healthy food activists Bryant Terry does an excellent job of blacksplaining why Thug Kitchen is problematic.

Now for the term whitesplain, it usually means that a white person is speaking condescendingly to a black person or other person of color when giving a white person's definition of racism (often wholly inadequate and stuck on overt racism) or is explaining why everything in America is fair and just: black people just need to work harder, and what about that "black on black crime" and those fatherless households. Another example of whitesplaining involves a white person telling a black person that in their eyes skin color is irrelevant. "I see everyone as the same. I'm color blind," they say, even as they speak to the black person in ways that make skin color very relevant.

It's possible also for a black person to whitesplain the world because frequently you may come across black people who have internalized the white supremacist propaganda against black people and don't think much of their own black skin and culture. For instance, it's possible that a black person wrote the first blacksplain definition at UrbanDictionary.com. Ironically that definition reads like whitesplaining.

But I'm not going to write here again all the reasons I am tried and worn out from blacksplaining. If you're interested in why that may be, though, please read my post on Toni Morrison's 1975 lecture. I'll just say here that I was a lot less tired before Trayvon Martin's death and the violent deaths of black people who have followed him since then and who were pre-judged and killed because they are black. And I'm really disappointed in myself that I've written this blog post that has some blacksplaining in it again.

Friday, December 5, 2014

#Ferguson to #ICantBreathe

I really should take up fine art again because I need a more physical art for the sake of mental therapy. But I haven't seriously drawn or attempted to paint in decades. I'm a writer. Still, lately I have found myself making little digital graphic cards to capture moments during this stressful period of seeing justice fail. We have received less than two weeks apart the decisions of two Grand Juries not to indict white police officers who have killed unarmed black men, namely Mike Brown and Eric Garner.

While making these documentation cards and digital protest signs have given me a measure of relief, they're not the what a trained graphic designer would produce. And that's okay with me because sometimes the most effective signs at protests are amateurish, ones written crookedly on piece of a box cardboard.

All of these have been posted on Twitter or Facebook or both, but I thought it made sense to put them in one post on my blog. They have been presented it here in order of most recent to earliest.

The list includes the side eye for Pat Lynch's insensitive statement, "If you're speaking, then you can breathe!"; a picture of Missouri's attorney general's statement that the law that allowed Darren Wilson to escape indictment needs to be eliminated and that it's unconstitutional; a recap of part of a CNN discussion with Sunny Hostin and men who support the Staten Island Grand Jury's decision; a Van Jones quote; a snarky commentary on McCulloch's failure to prosecute Wilson; a poem, and a video. For a look at the cards in their actual size, click here.












© 2014, Nordette N. Adams

Sunday, November 30, 2014

#NOLA #Ferguson March and Rally, Sunday Nov. 30 (Pics & Videos)


The picture above was taken at the Circle for Michael Brown rally and march in New Orleans this Sunday. Organized by the Black Youth Project of NOLA, #BYP100NOLA, the rally began at Lee Circle on the city's famous St. Charles Avenue. The circle is named for confederate general Robert E. Lee, and the organizers noted that in New Orleans, black people are surrounded by memorials to confederate heroes, people who wanted to keep black people enslaved. One organizer and activist, poet A Scribe Called Quess, declared that the Lee monument and others need to come down.

The BYP100 organization is run by and focuses on black people between the ages of 18-35, folks considerably younger than I am, but I went with my daughter. She and I attended the first Ferguson-related rally--National Moment of Silence--in August.

Today's group marched from Lee Circle to Congo Square, Louis Armstrong park, stopping at the midway point on Canal Street to perform a #DieIn. A die-in is a variation of the old fashioned 1960s sit-in. During a die-in, however, protesters lie down and mimic being dead to represent all the black people who have been killed by police. The BYP organization has organized DieIns around the country to protest police brutality in the wake of Mike Brown's killing and Darren Wilson's non-indictment.

 The New Orleans organizers also mentioned victims of neighborhood crime, such as young activist George Carter, 15, who was shot to death near his home in October. His body has been described as being "riddled with bullets."



Along with photos, I also captured Vine video at the event.

A little Bob Marley kept the crowd focused while awaiting the beginning of the rally.




Shortly after DieIn, march continues down Canal Street chanting "Black Lives Matter."



End of march rally, Congo Square



Another facet of the protests:

White Allies in the Ferguson Movement 



Black organizers of the rally asked white allies to guard the perimeter to create a buffer between police officers in case an officer became aggressive. According to the speakers (and I have heard of this as a non-violent direct action tactic), white allies played a similar role in some organized protests during the Civil Rights movement. For instance, young white people went down to Mississippi where they had to learn how to take directions from the black people who were being oppressed. Also, they weren't used to being attacked by police officers or white racists themselves either, so there was much to learn.

As the PBS documentary Freedom Summer explains, black activists in the South were tired, and they needed the help of young white activists from the north.



That said, the NOPD, which was not out in high numbers, kept its distance, blocking off streets so the protesters could walk and watching on the sidelines. Nontheless, according to organizers, the police have been highly visible at night when protesters meet at Congo Square/Armstrong Park.

Nearing the End of One Struggle in the Unending Struggle


Promoting inclusion of all members of the African-American community, a number of representatives from various groups spoke to the protesters at Congo Square, such as the director of Women with A Vision, and a young activists representing the LGBTQ community within the black community (young person pictured below). Poets recited their works as well, all part of the drum circle.




Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Darren Wilson says he chased Mike Brown in order to protect the back-up he called to protect him

By the end of Darren Wilson's testimony, he volunteered an explanation for why he chased unarmed teen Michael Brown, who he describes as "like a demon." Earlier in his testimony, he tells in detail why he was terrified of the youth, who he claims beat him nearly to death in the police car.

In the screen shot below, you'll read that Wilson made sure the jury heard that he chased Mike Brown in order to protect his fellow officers who were on their way to back him up. So, he was terrified but not too terrified to chase the teen. He knew he couldn't physically subdue Brown, and he chased him in order to protect his back-up, which had not yet arrived, officers who had guns of their own and would have arrived as a pack.

I remain convinced that Wilson wanted to shoot Mike Brown. I won't explain that again in this post, my reasons are posted here.

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Ferguson case is not only about what happened at the car

Yes. I have given Officer Darren Wilson the benefit of the doubt, considered that his version of events may be true. And yes, I did read Darren Wilson's Grand Jury testimony about the killing of unarmed teenager Mike Brown. I read it because I like to read documents first-hand and not have network talking heads or biased prosecutor Bob McCulloch tell me what to think.

Assuming that Wilson's account of events is true, I believe he was afraid when he wrestled in the car with Mike Brown, a young, muscular black male who was 6 ft 4" tall and near 300 pounds. Wilson says Brown was beating him in the face and calling him "a pussy" who wouldn't shoot him. (Manhood on the line there, if Wilson is telling the truth.)

Wilson gives a detailed explanation for why he chose to shoot rather than mace Brown, including that he prefers not to wear a Taser, and he says the teen went after his gun. He also says that Brown made him feel small. When he grabbed Brown's arm, he says he "felt like a five-year-old holding onto Hulk Hogan," page 212 (BTW, Hogan is 6 ft 7). Wilson is 6 ft 4 and about 210 pounds.

Later he describes Brown on page 225 as having a look of intense aggression on his face, "like a demon." And he also says that he believes if Brown hit him again, Brown would kill him. Finally, he shoots twice while the two are at the car, hitting Brown in the hand. Then Brown takes of running, stirring up dust in his wake.


So, as it says in the screenshot above, after Brown takes off, Wilson calls for more police cars and then he takes off after Brown. This is where Wilson's story begins to get shady for me. After thinking about it a while, I believe Wilson, knowing that if he shot Brown to death he would face no penalties whatsoever, pursued the teen. The moment Wilson chased Brown, he had made his decision to shoot to kill. He had already decided that Mike Brown's life didn't matter.

The Michael Brown case is not about what happened at the car


While media outlets have made a big deal about what happened at the car, and indeed it is serious to assault a police officer, the focus on the what happened at the car is a distraction designed to convince everyone that Officer Wilson feared for his life. But the reason the Grand Jury could decide not to indict Officer Wilson rests legally in Missouri's unconstitutional law that gives police officers the right to shoot a fleeing, unarmed felon.

All those documents McCulloch dumped on the jury, dumped with no instruction or recommendation of charges, were provided to overwhelm the jurors' brains, making it easier for them to decide whatever McCulloch wanted them to decide. The center of that big fecal cake, however, is that outdated law.

If you attack a police officer, you are deemed a Class A felon in Missouri. So, if you believe Wilson's story about what happened at the car, then he had a right to pursue and shoot Brown because Brown was a felon based on the officer's say-so. Officer Wilson, and I'm sure every other police officer in Missouri knows that this law will always protect them. It gives them a license to killed unarmed people. All they have to say is, "He attacked me."

In Wilson's case, he took the incident account a step further. He not only said Mike Brown attacked him, but he played into the fear of big black men, dehumanizing Brown, making him sound superhuman, demonic even. (See study that many whites think black people have superhuman powers. Nine of the jurors were white, three were black.) Later when he describes how Mike Brown came at him after the teen had run more than 150 feet away, he uses language that makes Brown sound like a charging bull"
"He turns, and when he looked at me, he made like a grunting, like aggravated sound and he starts, he turns and he's coming back toward me. His first step is coming towards me, he kind of does like a stutter step to start running" (227).

But Mike Brown ran away after the first shots at the car. That's where I see a big hole in Wilson's story. Wilson called for extra police cars, but those cars had not arrived when he chased Mike Brown. When Wilson decided to chase Mike Brown, he knew that Brown was unarmed. The only way Brown posed a threat to Wilson was if Brown were close enough to grab Wilson.

Here are my questions: If Wilson were that afraid of Brown, then how did the officer think he was going to subdue Brown and handcuff him by himself? If he were that afraid of Brown, and since the teen had already allegedly shown he would attack a police officer, then why did Wilson pursue him alone unless he'd already made up his mind to gun him down if the opportunity arose? Do we need a law now that says if you're a little or thin guy with a badge, don't pursue an unarmed person who's bigger than you and who you already know you can't beat in a fight?

So, this is where we are, where I am--Wilson decided before he ever left his car that it was okay to kill Mike Brown because Mike Brown was a big black man. Yes, it's open season on black people in Missouri and much of the rest of the country, too. The Grand Jury's decision made that much clear.




Monday, October 13, 2014

Dr. Cornel West arrested at Moral Mondays protest, Ferguson (Videos)

cornel west arrested in ferguson

Above, veteran social justice activist, Dr. Cornel West, is handcuffed and arrested in Ferguson, Missouri. From RT article:
NBC News reported from Ferguson that West and others had attempted to create a makeshift memorial outside of the police station on Monday for Michael Brown, a local teen shot two months ago this weekend by a Ferguson cop, but arrests began soon after when demonstrators reportedly breached caution time and advanced towards the station.

In this video, West is shoved a bit in crowd's scuffle with police.



Protest video from USA Today, which previously said Ferguson has gone from protests to a movement.



From USA Today, October 13:
FERGUSON, Mo. – Police arrested clergy and activist academic Cornel West on Monday as they led hundreds of protesters in a march to the police station to draw attention to police shootings nationwide.

The protests Monday were the culmination of "Ferguson October" – four days of activism and civil disobedience sparked by the killing of Michael Brown, an unarmed, 18-year-old black man, by a white police officer on Aug. 9 in this St. Louis suburb.
On the Big Picture RT, Thom discusses the renewed protests in Ferguson, MO with Radio Talk Show Host and Activist Joe Madison.

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Mike Brown's Killing: Two new witnesses, contractors, speak

As I said in my previous post on Darren Wilson supporters, two new witnesses, contractors who were working at the apartment complex in Ferguson on August 9 when Mike Brown Jr. was killed, have come forward. They saw Wilson shoot to death the unarmed 18-year-old. Today, CNN posted cell phone video that someone filmed of the two contractors reacting to the officer shooting down the teen immediately after the shooting.

One of the men is seen in the video holding his hands up yelling "He had his hands f**king up!" as police lay crime scene tape in the background.

At the end of the video, another man who is not one of the contractors says that Brown was going down, holding his hands over his stomach and falling forward, but Officer Wilson kept shooting. His account of Mike Brown's position is corroborated by the autopsy that Michael Baden conducted, the pathologist who did so on behalf of the family. Baden said that one of the bullets entered the top of Brown's head in a way that indicated the youth was falling forward or on his knees with his head down.



Today, more upheaval in Ferguson as 35 people were arrested for attempting to block Interstate 70, and Tuesday night at the city's first council meeting since the shooting, citizens, unhappy with proposed policy changes, blasted city leaders. A Saint Louis activist said that Ferguson leaders had lost their authority to govern.

Sunday, September 7, 2014

Since Darren Wilson was shooting at Michael Brown while the teen was running away from him, then . . .


Why I have allowed Darren Wilson supporters to engage me on Twitter, I don't know. Who has the time to talk to people who keep talking about "waiting for the facts" when it's already clear that they've bought Officer Wilson's story in the absence of facts? Last week I found myself attempting to reason with one man, but no matter how many ways I explained to him that the police do not dispute that Mike Brown Jr. was unarmed and Wilson began shooting from a distance of more than 25 feet, finally shooting Brown fatally somewhere between seven and two feet away, Twitter man kept parroting, "But the autopsy shows he wasn't shot in the back."

Does saying Wilson was shooting at Brown while  Brown was running way the same as saying Wilson shot Brown the back? I don't think so. Wilson was shooting at a moving target, so he was more likely to miss.

I repeated to this man more than once that I was not saying that Mike Brown was shot in the back. I'm saying that according to multiple witnesses, Wilson began shooting after Brown at the same time the 18-year-old was running, putting more distance between himself and the cop. This means that Wilson was shooting at the unarmed teen in a residential area while Wilson was not in immediate danger.

Twitter man swore that the police had disputed that Wilson fired while Brown was running, but he had nothing to cite to back that up, and people who have been seriously paying attention to the Ferguson story know that one problem with the Ferguson Police Chief is that he has been uncommunicative with citizens and sometimes deceptive when he is. Still, the man tweeted back that Brown "was not shot in the back."

I almost tweeted to him that I suspected he suffered from a reading comprehension problem, but I decided to block him instead because he added nothing to my feed but stupidity and rudeness. Honestly, I think some of these Wilson supporters think Black people operate via some kind of hive mind, so if one Black person uses the phrase "shot in the back," that must means all Black people are saying that.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Ferguson and the voter suppression issue

This post has been syndicated at Blogher.com!


I suspect St. Louis County, Missouri, has a voter suppression problem. When I say voter suppression, I include not only racially biased voting regulations, district creation, and schedules but also the work of an adept group of GOP activists who will throw out voter registrations under the guise of "voter fraud charges." They will also send overly-zealous vote challengers to monitor the polls, and they have supported a mysterious conservative organization that claimed to be a voting rights organization yet worked to decrease voting.

Voter suppression in Missouri should not be news to progressive political organizers. Nonetheless, it's crucial that people who plan to register people of color to vote in St. Louis County understand what they're really up against.

Most people who pay attention to politics know that Black voters tend to vote for Democratic Party candidates, and they may also know that the Republican party has been unhappy about voter registration drives in Black communities. GOP activists have admitted that much: they want to stop Democratic Party voters from getting to the polls. Therefore, is it possible that in St. Louis County elections the GOP has been more effective than the media cares to report?

I fully disclose here that in 2007 and 2008, I worked about six months as the

Both tyranny and chaos silence free speech


Wednesday, August 20, 2014

What did Martin Luther King Jr. mean, "A riot is the language of the unheard"?


Last year about this time, a whole year before the civil unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, after the killing of 18-year-old Mike Brown, CBS's 60 Minutes posted an overtime segment featuring Martin Luther King, Jr. The segment is part of last year's commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights March on Washington. Its headline is the King quote you may have heard repeated since the tear gas began to cloud Ferguson's night air:
"A riot is the language of the unheard."
The overtime piece features Mike Wallace's 1966 interview with King in which he asked the Civil Rights leader how he felt about a growing number of Black people rejecting non-violent methods. Here is part of what was said, but I hope you watch the full video interview yourself.
MIKE WALLACE: There's an increasingly vocal minority who disagree totally with your tactics, Dr. King.

KING: There's no doubt about that. I will agree that there is a group in the Negro community advocating violence now. I happen to feel that this group represents a numerical minority. Surveys have revealed this. The vast majority of Negroes still feel that the best way to deal with the dilemma that we face in this country is through non-violent resistance, and I don't think this vocal group will be able to make a real dent in the Negro community in terms of swaying 22 million Negroes to this particular point of view. And I contend that the cry of "black power" is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we've got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard. And, what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the economic plight of the Negro poor has worsened over the last few years.

WALLACE: How many summers like this do you imagine that we can expect?

KING: Well, I would say this: we don't have long. The mood of the Negro community now is one of urgency, one of saying that we aren't going to wait. That we've got to have our freedom. We've waited too long. So that I would say that every summer we're going to have this kind of vigorous protest. My hope is that it will be non-violent. I would hope that we can avoid riots because riots are self-defeating and socially destructive. I would hope that we can avoid riots, but that we would be as militant and as determined next summer and through the winter as we have been this summer. And I think the answer about how long it will take will depend on the federal government, on the city halls of our various cities, and on White America to a large extent. This is where we are at this point, and I think White America will determine how long it will be and which way we go in the future.
Lagniappe: I also recommend this editorial by Rebecca Carroll at the Guardian, "Why are white people scared of black people's rage at Mike Brown's death?" Carroll addresses her complaint directly to a white audience. Here's a key passage:
You are the ones who created this godforsaken racist system by using your circumstantial power and privilege 400 years ago to institutionalize white supremacy. Now use that power and privilege you still have, 400 years later, to dismantle it.

And please don’t quibble about whether you have any direct lineage to the architects of racism. You are benefitting from it, so you have a direct responsibility to figure out how to undo it. Because maybe you’ve seen what happens when we black people try to undo it in 2014 – they call in the National Guard.
Finally, if you've been wondering where people who are more informed about what's happening in Ferguson get their news, try this Vox.com list of reporters who are tweeting news live from the ground in Ferguson.

Tweeted Poem: On Florissant


On Florissant

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Saturday, August 16, 2014

Adage the news: Today's thought on dissent in Ferguson


It is the first responsibility of every citizen to
question authority. - Ben Franklin

Not for the Sake of Dissent
Humans in positions of power
generally do what they should do.
But without the people questioning,
would the powerful stay true?
Nordette N. Adams
2014

Friday, August 15, 2014

American due process and justice for Mike Brown: Video of alleged robbery by the big black man

This morning, the Ferguson, Missouri, police department released the name of the officer who shot Michael Brown to death. The officer has been identified as Officer Darren Wilson, a six-year veteran of the police force. Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson also released an incident report and a video showing a large black man allegedly committing a "strong-arm" robbery of cigarillos from a convenience store. The department alleges the man in the video to be Brown.

Already some people are angry about the video saying that either it's not Brown or it's not Brown on the day of the shooting, while others (and you can guess their sociopolitical leanings by their opinions) think the video exonerates Officer Wilson and the Ferguson Police Department.

The former doesn't matter in terms of the protest or the shooting, and the latter is plainly not true. In America, the police don't get to shoot unarmed people regardless of race.

As I said on Facebook and Twitter:

"Whether you believe that's ‪#‎MichaelBrown‬ in ‪#‎Ferguson‬ video or not, whoever it is is UNARMED. So, if the police want to stand by that video, what they've really shown us is Mike Brown did NOT have a gun. Do not be distracted! ‪#‎NMOS14‬"

And a person tweeted back: "@nordette_verite And last I checked, the punishment for theft of a Swisher isn't execution without trial!"

National Moment of Silence 14, New Orleans, #NMOS14, in solidarity with Ferguson protesters (Video)



#NMOS14
National Moment of Silence
New Orleans, Louisiana
August 14, 2014

A nonviolent vigil held in solidarity with the
Ferguson, Missouri, protests to honor the
memory of Michael Brown and all other victims
of police brutality and vigilantism.

Organized via Twitter
and other social media
by @FeministaJones, #NMOS14
prompted vigils nationwide.

Approximately 200-plus people
participated at Lafayette Square
on St. Charles Avenue.

The young woman speaking in the video is
a Dillard University student named Chanelle,
aka @WhatTheNelle_12 on Twitter.

According to her T-shirt, she is also a
member of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority.

Names read during the moment of silence included
Mike Brown, Eric Gardner, Wendell Allen,
James Brisette, Henry Glover,
Trayvon Martin, Jordan Davis, Ronald Madison
Patrick Dorismond, Oscar Grant,
Sean Bell, Kimani Gray, Renisha McBride,
and too many more called to "rest in power."

Shanelle also said that young people like her are said to be
apathetic and not to care, but the young people at the vigil
should show the world that they do care.

She said that police brutality and vigilantism is not
only a Black problem, but everyone's problem.

And as a sign-up sheet was passed around, she added
that it's important to mobilize to reduce
other acts of violence in New Orleans.
Too many bodies on our streets.

We never know how near we are to those touched
by violence. During the vigil, next to me stood Emily,
the young woman with the sign.

Emily lives in New Orleans and is
Michael Brown's cousin.

Her sign says:
"Be angry.
Be outraged.
Don't be
distracted.

This video was posted by
the Whose Shoes Are These Anyway blog
and Her411.com